HK STRATEGY ADVISORY
Executive AI Governance Review

How is AI actually governed in your organisation?

In most organisations, AI use has moved faster than the governance around it. These ten statements will show you by how much.

Say which are true of your organisation today, and you will receive a written Executive AI Governance Review: where your governance actually stands, the priority governance risks that matter most, and what your leadership team needs to decide. Reviewed personally by Hassan Khan.

Ten statements · under three minutes
Complimentary · indicative value £950
Returned within three to five working days
0 of 10 answered
Answer all ten to see where you stand

Most organisations we see have three or four of these genuinely operating. The useful information is which ones — and where something exists on paper but isn’t yet consistently applied in practice. There is no pass mark, and the honest answer is always the useful one.

What we can see

We could say today which AI tools and use cases are in operation across the organisation, and where.

you could produce a current list today

There is a clearly named senior person accountable for AI governance across the organisation.

you could name them

Our staff know what they may and may not use AI for.

they could tell you the rule without looking it up

What we control

A new AI tool cannot use live organisational data or influence a real decision without appropriate approval.

you could name the last tool that went through it

We have a practical way of identifying and addressing AI tools or uses that have not been approved.

something, or someone, would surface it

We have considered where AI could create unfair outcomes for people affected by our work or decisions.

there is a piece of work you could point to

We have defined when AI-assisted decisions require human review, and when people should be told AI was involved.

including having established that you don’t use AI this way

What we can stand behind

We know what would happen, and who would act, if an AI tool caused a problem.

someone could name the first call they would make

If challenged today, we could show what AI governance was in place six months ago.

for example, to a client, regulator, funder, insurer or board

Leadership has agreed what AI will and won’t be used for here.

it was a decision, not an assumption

For the things you marked as established and working — is that because there is a process that would survive people changing roles, or because a particular person happens to stay on top of it?

Where shall I send your review?

Your Executive AI Governance Review will set out where your governance stands, the priority governance risks that matter most, and the decisions your leadership team needs to take. Reviewed personally and returned within three to five working days.

Where does AI currently touch your organisation? (optional — tick any)

No sales calls unless you ask for one. Your details are used only to prepare and send your review, are not shared with anyone else, and you can ask for them to be deleted at any time by replying to the review. Lawful basis: legitimate interests.

Thank you — your review is being prepared

You have just done the thing most organisations haven’t. Your responses will be reviewed personally and your Executive AI Governance Review sent within three to five working days.

Visit hkstrategyadvisory.com